el cat en
База данных: ELS EBSCO eBook
Page 1, Results: 2
Отмеченные записи: 0
1.
Подробнее
DDC 323
C 95
Curran, Eleanor, (1956-).
Re-thinking rights : : historical development and philosophical justification / / Eleanor Curran. - Lanham, Maryland : : Lexington Books,, [2022]. - 1 online resource. - Includes bibliographical references and index. - URL: https://library.dvfu.ru/lib/document/SK_ELIB/BB42DB63-BDE0-4DD2-BA7B-AE945BC13387. - ISBN 1498547885. - ISBN 9781498547888 (electronic bk.)
Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
Параллельные издания: Print version: : Curran, Eleanor, 1956- Re-thinking rights. - Lanham, Maryland : Lexington Books, [2022]. - ISBN 9781498547871
Содержание:
Introduction -- Part 1. The History of Rights Theory. The Beginning: The Rise of the Idea of Natural Rights -- The Philosophical Discrediting of Natural Law and Natural Rights -- Does Hobbes Rather than Locke Provide a Forerunner to Modern Theories of Rights? -- The Jurisprudential Turn in Rights Theorising -- Reading Historical Writing on Rights: The Distorting Influence of Hohfeld -- Part 2. Current and Future Rights Theory: Assessing the Philosophy of Rights. The Continuing Dominance of Hohfeld -- Current Theories of Rights: The Will and Interest Theories and Theories of Human Rights -- Thoughts for Future Rights Theorising.
~РУБ DDC 323
Рубрики: Human rights.
Civil rights.
Law--Philosophy.
Law and ethics.
Human Rights
Droits de l'homme (Droit international)
Droit et morale.
Civil rights.
Human rights.
Law and ethics.
Law--Philosophy.
Аннотация: "This book takes a new look at the history of individual rights, focusing on how philosophers have written that history. Eleanor Curran argues that the turn to jurisprudence, after the philosophical rejection of natural rights, has resulted in an impoverished notion of rights as no more than claims and entitlements"--
C 95
Curran, Eleanor, (1956-).
Re-thinking rights : : historical development and philosophical justification / / Eleanor Curran. - Lanham, Maryland : : Lexington Books,, [2022]. - 1 online resource. - Includes bibliographical references and index. - URL: https://library.dvfu.ru/lib/document/SK_ELIB/BB42DB63-BDE0-4DD2-BA7B-AE945BC13387. - ISBN 1498547885. - ISBN 9781498547888 (electronic bk.)
Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
Параллельные издания: Print version: : Curran, Eleanor, 1956- Re-thinking rights. - Lanham, Maryland : Lexington Books, [2022]. - ISBN 9781498547871
Содержание:
Introduction -- Part 1. The History of Rights Theory. The Beginning: The Rise of the Idea of Natural Rights -- The Philosophical Discrediting of Natural Law and Natural Rights -- Does Hobbes Rather than Locke Provide a Forerunner to Modern Theories of Rights? -- The Jurisprudential Turn in Rights Theorising -- Reading Historical Writing on Rights: The Distorting Influence of Hohfeld -- Part 2. Current and Future Rights Theory: Assessing the Philosophy of Rights. The Continuing Dominance of Hohfeld -- Current Theories of Rights: The Will and Interest Theories and Theories of Human Rights -- Thoughts for Future Rights Theorising.
Рубрики: Human rights.
Civil rights.
Law--Philosophy.
Law and ethics.
Human Rights
Droits de l'homme (Droit international)
Droit et morale.
Civil rights.
Human rights.
Law and ethics.
Law--Philosophy.
Аннотация: "This book takes a new look at the history of individual rights, focusing on how philosophers have written that history. Eleanor Curran argues that the turn to jurisprudence, after the philosophical rejection of natural rights, has resulted in an impoverished notion of rights as no more than claims and entitlements"--
2.
Подробнее
DDC 340/.112
O-84
Osiel, Mark,.
The right to do wrong : : morality and the limits of law / / Mark Osiel. - Cambridge, Massachusetts : : Harvard University Press,, 2019. - 1 online resource. - Includes bibliographical references and index. - URL: https://library.dvfu.ru/lib/document/SK_ELIB/3E41ABEB-C761-41FD-AC07-CC448F21FAE7. - ISBN 9780674240193 (electronic bk.). - ISBN 0674240197 (electronic bk.)
Print version record.
Параллельные издания: Print version: : Osiel, Mark. Right to do wrong. - Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2019. - ISBN 9780674368255
Содержание:
Common morality, social mores, and the law -- A sampling of rights to do wrong -- Three rights to do serious wrong -- How to "abuse" a right -- Law and morality in ordinary language and social science -- Divergences of law and morals: sites and sources -- Convergences of law and morals: sites and sources -- Questions of method and meaning -- Why this book is not what you had in mind -- The changing stance of lawyers towards common morality -- Commercial morality, bourgeois virtue, and the law -- How we attach responsibilities to rights -- Common morality confronts modernity.
~РУБ DDC 340/.112
Рубрики: Law and ethics.
Law and ethics.
LAW / Essays
LAW / General Practice
LAW / Jurisprudence
LAW / Paralegals & Paralegalism
LAW / Practical Guides
LAW / Reference
Аннотация: The law sometimes permits what ordinary morality, or widely-shared notions of right and wrong, reproaches. Rights to Do Grave Wrong explores the relationship between law and common morality to clarify law's reliance on society's broad presumption that people will exercise their rights responsibly. More concretely, he argues that certain legal rights rest on tacit sociological assumptions as to who will exercise them, under what circumstances, and how frequently. Further, he argues that we depend on stigma and shame to reduce and circumscribe the law's use. Some examples: though reneging on a debt is considered wrong, the law allows you to declare personal bankruptcy; international law allows museums to retain some masterworks looted from their rightful owners; in many countries abortion is permitted as a means of birth control. Using these examples and more, Osiel presents a "social scientific" analysis of law's interaction with social mores and the extent to which they limit our exercising rights to do wrong. The paradox he intends to elucidate is when and why it is appropriate for societies to champion de jure entitlements even as they successfully limit their de facto usage.--
O-84
Osiel, Mark,.
The right to do wrong : : morality and the limits of law / / Mark Osiel. - Cambridge, Massachusetts : : Harvard University Press,, 2019. - 1 online resource. - Includes bibliographical references and index. - URL: https://library.dvfu.ru/lib/document/SK_ELIB/3E41ABEB-C761-41FD-AC07-CC448F21FAE7. - ISBN 9780674240193 (electronic bk.). - ISBN 0674240197 (electronic bk.)
Print version record.
Параллельные издания: Print version: : Osiel, Mark. Right to do wrong. - Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2019. - ISBN 9780674368255
Содержание:
Common morality, social mores, and the law -- A sampling of rights to do wrong -- Three rights to do serious wrong -- How to "abuse" a right -- Law and morality in ordinary language and social science -- Divergences of law and morals: sites and sources -- Convergences of law and morals: sites and sources -- Questions of method and meaning -- Why this book is not what you had in mind -- The changing stance of lawyers towards common morality -- Commercial morality, bourgeois virtue, and the law -- How we attach responsibilities to rights -- Common morality confronts modernity.
Рубрики: Law and ethics.
Law and ethics.
LAW / Essays
LAW / General Practice
LAW / Jurisprudence
LAW / Paralegals & Paralegalism
LAW / Practical Guides
LAW / Reference
Аннотация: The law sometimes permits what ordinary morality, or widely-shared notions of right and wrong, reproaches. Rights to Do Grave Wrong explores the relationship between law and common morality to clarify law's reliance on society's broad presumption that people will exercise their rights responsibly. More concretely, he argues that certain legal rights rest on tacit sociological assumptions as to who will exercise them, under what circumstances, and how frequently. Further, he argues that we depend on stigma and shame to reduce and circumscribe the law's use. Some examples: though reneging on a debt is considered wrong, the law allows you to declare personal bankruptcy; international law allows museums to retain some masterworks looted from their rightful owners; in many countries abortion is permitted as a means of birth control. Using these examples and more, Osiel presents a "social scientific" analysis of law's interaction with social mores and the extent to which they limit our exercising rights to do wrong. The paradox he intends to elucidate is when and why it is appropriate for societies to champion de jure entitlements even as they successfully limit their de facto usage.--
Page 1, Results: 2