Electronic catalog

DDC 128/.33
K 45
Kimhi, Irad,.
    Thinking and being / / Irad Kimhi. - Cambridge, Massachusetts : : Harvard University Press,, ©2018. - 1 online resource (166 pages). - Includes bibliographical references and index. - URL: https://library.dvfu.ru/lib/document/SK_ELIB/02B91EA2-767E-4EE1-BFB4-4DF7FECDD82B. - ISBN 9780674985308 (electronic bk.). - ISBN 0674985303 (electronic bk.)
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed June 21, 2018).
    Содержание:
The life of p -- The dominant sense of being -- On the quietism of the Stranger.

~РУБ DDC 128/.33

Рубрики: Analysis (Philosophy)

   Thought and thinking.

   Logic.

   Ontology.

   Language and logic.

   Analysis (Philosophy)

   Language and logic.

   Logic.

   Ontology.

   Thought and thinking.

   PHILOSOPHY / Movements / Humanism

   PHILOSOPHY / Logic

Аннотация: Opposing a long-standing orthodoxy of the Western philosophical tradition running from ancient Greek thought until the late nineteenth century, Frege argued that psychological laws of thought--those that explicate how we in fact think--must be distinguished from logical laws of thought--those that formulate and impose rational requirements on thinking. Logic does not describe how we actually think, but only how we should. Yet by thus sundering the logical from the psychological, Frege was unable to explain certain fundamental logical truths, most notably the psychological version of the law of non-contradiction--that one cannot think a thought and its negation simultaneously. Irad Kimhi's Thinking and Being marks a radical break with Frege's legacy in analytic philosophy, exposing the flaws of his approach and outlining a novel conception of judgment as a two-way capacity. In closing the gap that Frege opened, Kimhi shows that the two principles of non-contradiction--the ontological principle and the psychological principle--are in fact aspects of the very same capacity, differently manifested in thinking and being. As his argument progresses, Kimhi draws on the insights of historical figures such as Aristotle, Kant, and Wittgenstein to develop highly original accounts of topics that are of central importance to logic and philosophy more generally. Self-consciousness, language, and logic are revealed to be but different sides of the same reality. Ultimately, Kimhi's work elucidates the essential sameness of thinking and being that has exercised Western philosophy since its inception.--

Доп.точки доступа:
Frege, Gottlob,

DDC 160
K 17
Kalbarczyk, Alexander,.
    Predication and Ontology : : Studies and Texts on Avicennian and Post-Avicennian Readings of Aristotle's ›Categories‹ / / Alexander Kalbarczyk. - 1515/9783110591972. - Berlin ; ; Boston : : De Gruyter,, ©2018. - 1 online resource (355 p.). ( час. мин.), 1515/9783110591972. - (Scientia Graeco-Arabica ; ; 22). - In English. - URL: https://library.dvfu.ru/lib/document/SK_ELIB/C394B5D5-A3A4-4AF9-BA9B-680DAEC56A06. - ISBN 9783110591989 (electronic bk.). - ISBN 3110591987 (electronic bk.)
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 21. Aug 2018).
Параллельные издания:
1. Print version: :
2. Print version: :

~РУБ DDC 160

Рубрики: Arabic ontology.

   Arabic philosophy of language.

   Arabische Ontologie.

   Aristoteles /Kategorien.

   Aristotle's Categories.

   Avicenna.

   Ontology.

   Predicate (Logic)

   Islamic philosophy.

   PHILOSOPHY / Logic

Аннотация: In Predication and Ontology A. Kalbarczyk provides the first monograph-length study of the Arabic reception of Aristotle's Categories. At the center of attention is the critical reappraisal of that treatise by Ibn Sīnā (d. 428 AH/1037 AD), better known in the Latin West as Avicenna. Ibn Sīnā's reading of the Categories is examined in the context of his wider project of rearranging the transmitted body of philosophical knowledge. Against the background of the late ancient commentary tradition and subsequent exegetical efforts, Ibn Sīnā's Kitāb al-Maqūlāt of the Šifāʼ is interpreted as a milestone in the gradual reshuffle of the relationship between logic proper and ontology. In order to assess the philosophical impact of this realignment, some of the subsequent developments in Ibn Sīnā's writings and in the emerging post-Avicennian tradition are also taken into account. The thematic focus lies on the two fundamental classification schemes which Aristotle introduces in the treatise: the fourfold division of Cat. 2 ("of a subject"/"in a subject") and the tenfold scheme of Cat. 4 (i.e., substance and the nine genera of accidents). They both pose the question of whether and how the manner in which an expression is predicated relates to extra-linguistic reality. As the study intends to show, this question is one of the driving forces of Ibn Sīnā's momentous reform of the Aristotelian curriculum.

Доп.точки доступа:
Aristotle.
Avicenna,