Перейти к содержимому 
DDC 338.9
C 69
Colander, David C. ,
Where economics went wrong : : Chicago's abandonment of classical liberalism / / David Colander and Craig Freedman. - Princeton, New Jersey : : Princeton University Press,, [2019]. - 1 online resource (xii, 267 pages). - Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-254) and index. - URL: https://library.dvfu.ru/lib/document/SK_ELIB/C91A3C4E-19B5-4154-BE99-7299619A5D09
. - ISBN 9780691184050 (electronic book). - ISBN 0691184054 (electronic book)
Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed October 22, 2018).
Параллельные издания:
1. Print version: : COLANDER, DAVID. WHERE ECONOMICS WENT WRONG. - [Place of publication not identified] : PRINCETON UNIV PRESS, 2018. - ISBN 0691179204
2. Print version: : Colander, David C. Where economics went wrong. - Princeton : Princeton University Press, [2019]. - ISBN 9780691179209
Содержание:
Sweet science : engineering a new approach to economic policy -- A classical garden of liberal economics : policy versus abstraction -- Planting the seeds of a Chicago tradition -- Ashes and diamonds : the rise of the Chicago School -- What has Chicago wrought? Painting policy by the numbers -- Economic policy becomes a science : the rise of welfare economics, and the Chicago alternative -- Roads not taken : the Stillborn Virginia School of Economics -- The classical liberal "argumentation for the sake of heaven" alternative -- The art and craft of economics : the classical liberal attitude.
Рубрики: Economic policy.
Liberalism.
Comparative economics.
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Industries / General.
Comparative economics.
Economic policy.
Liberalism.
Аннотация: How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its way. Milton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman's prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots. Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago-one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics-as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong. Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists.